The opinion of
Derek McClintock of Phoenix
went as follows:
“I read with great interest Cathi
Herrod's viewpoint on the importance of marriage as a "fundamental
building block of our society" ("Support of tried-and-true tradition
of man-woman nuptials will grow," Viewpoints, Sunday).
With the great weight Herrod attaches to
this institution and her obvious expertise in citing "study after
study" regarding wealth creation and child rearing, I have a simple question.
Would not the greatest threat to this
institution be divorce and not expanding the boundaries of the current
definition of marriage to include a small minority of the population?
I would like to propose an innovative solution that not only includes the small gay and lesbian population who want to legally recognize their relationships as others are free to do, but also severely penalizes anyone divorcing themselves from these marriage contracts since doing so poses such a threat to the very foundations of our republic.
I would think that libertarians would
welcome such a fiscally responsible solution. And this actually has the added
benefit of not being a thinly veiled argument of exclusion and prejudice.
-- Derek McClintock, Phoenix ”
Now I respect
everyone’s right to have an opinion and especially a religious opinion such as
this but I don’t think this was completely thought through. While I am a firm believer in the sanctity of
marriage and that all marriages if they can be saved should be when they come
upon troubled times but there are scenarios when divorce is the only solution
and in those times the person that files for divorce should not be
penalized. I of course am speaking of
times when domestic violence rears its ugly head.
Is it fair to
fine or penalize a woman or a man who is trying to escape violence? Is it fair for a man or woman who only option
is divorce in order to protect the children from an attacker who is a
parent? Should someone be forced to stay
in a marriage were one of the parents is sexually molesting the children?
I am in
agreement with religions that believe that marriage is serious business and
should be saved but I must part ways with a dogma that would force someone to
stay in an abusive and possibly fatal situation. A persons’ safety and that of the children
should be out and fortunately the legislator and judiciary of the State of Arizona agrees with me.
1 comment:
This is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your posts, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the excellent work.
Spanish Fork Car Accident Lawyer
Car Accident Lawyerr
Utah Car Accident Lawyer
Car Accident
Payson Car Accident
Springville Car Accident
Post a Comment